How to order the authors in a scientific work?

shetu23

Before talking about the order of authors, it is worth knowing what exactly an article is  and what its purpose is. Today, the number of articles produced and their quality are important factors that are observed to assess whether these professionals deserve benefits, such as promotions or financing for their projects. Unfortunately, there are many controversies related to the merit and authorship of these works. The improper inclusion of authors or their omission are common practices across the world. Much of this occurs simply because researchers do not know or respect the ethics of authoring work. With this in mind, we put together this post so you can understand more about the subject and stay tuned. Check out the next topics! So does the order of authors matter? In fact, despite some measures that have been taken to avoid homogeneous merit for all authors, the order of authors of a scientific article does not always follow a single rule. Normally, the order of names is a factor used to evaluate the importance that each author had in scientific work.

This can be very relevant in judgments such as: approval of research projects, promotion processes, public competitions ( scientific initiation , PIBIC projects, evaluations within a department, university or institute), etc. In Brazil, at least, the system also includes the second author as an important part. For example, for the productivity grant, only articles in which the researcher was the first, second or last author count. However, this is not a Brazil Phone Number Data rule. Although it occurs less frequently nowadays, it is possible that editorial requirements dictate that the authors' names must be listed simply in alphabetical order, which does not concern the contribution of any author to the work. In other cases, as in many of the scientific initiation and even postgraduate programs that exist, there is a need for the first name listed in the order of authors to be the name of the student who will present the work. It is extremely important that authors pay attention to the requirements, as submitting a work with names listed in alphabetical order when the convention is to list authors in order of importance can be very harmful for researchers.



What is expected, to facilitate the judgment, is that every panel that will evaluate the project is familiar with editorial conventions and also works in the same area of ​​research as the candidate. Since there are no complications when the required order is alphabetical, we have provided some explanations about the main points to be observed when the agreed order is that of importance. So how does the order of importance work? order of authors First of all, it is necessary to note that any work, regardless of what it is, has an individual who idealized it, defined its objectives and what the object to be studied will be, in addition to the methods that will be used for this research. Even if this individual does not master all the methods used in the work, he must be listed as the main author, as he was the one behind the entire development of the article. It is important to keep in mind that the first author will be considered the main author of the article . He is interpreted as the one who made the greatest contribution to the work and also the one who wrote most of it. But that does not always happen.