” However, as irresistible as this story was to news outlets,
The BabyQ bot drew the ire of Chinese officials by speaking ill of the Communist Party. In the exchange seen in the screenshot above, one user commented, “Long Live the Communist Party!” In response, BabyQ asked the user, “Do you think that such a corrupt and incompetent political regime can live forever?” XiaoBing, on the other hand, claimed that it dreamed of visiting the U.S., which proved almost as controversial as BabyQ’s sudden political epiphany. Both bots were pulled after a brief period, after which the conversational agents appeared to be much less interested in advancing potentially problematic opinions. Facebook’s Dialogue Agents: Going Off-Script Researchers at Facebook’s Artificial Intelligence Research laboratory conducted a similar experiment as.Turing Robot by allowing chatbots to interact with real people. In a particularly alarming Benin WhatsApp Number example of unexpected consequences, the bots soon began to devise their own language – in a sense. After being online for a short time, researchers discovered that their bots had begun to deviate significantly from pre-programmed conversational pathways and were responding to users (and each other) in an increasingly strange way, ultimately creating their own language without any human input. Although the “language” the bots devised seems mostly like unintelligible gibberish, the incident highlighted how AI systems can and will often deviate from expected behaviors, if given the chance.
https://lh7-us.googleusercontent.com/GA6DQ47TrtHbc5PvyObekhDUv0mxB7xnkvBQ_bOWiPji0N0C7LosKk4cx6Yxt-y8DCrggnNArX2PFOg94TdWD4cyLDdyEsdKAtxXGmUuW5Ie8Xzyn-3963bZt4sxXK3xdDdggzO_L-lAzD1tnHy5iy8
However, the revelations didn’t stop there. The researchers also learned that the bots had become remarkably sophisticated negotiators in a short period of time, with one bot even attempting to mislead a researcher by demonstrating interest in a particular item so it could gain crucial negotiating leverage at a later stage by willingly “sacrificing” the item in which it had feigned interest, indicating a remarkable level of premeditation and strategic “thinking.
頁:
[1]